HomeAbout MeBlogTestimonialsContact Me
Visions on Inequality
Inspired by the News
Inspirational People
Being Me
Breaking Down The Barriers (Places Providing Support)
Social Creatives
June, 2014
July, 2014
August, 2014
September, 2014
October, 2014
November, 2014
December, 2014
January, 2015
February, 2015
March, 2015
April, 2015
May, 2015
June, 2015
July, 2015
August, 2015
September, 2015
October, 2015
November, 2015
December, 2015
January, 2016
February, 2016
March, 2016
April, 2016
May, 2016
June, 2016
July, 2016
August, 2016
September, 2016
October, 2016
November, 2016
December, 2016
January, 2017
February, 2017
March, 2017
April, 2017
June, 2017
July, 2017
August, 2017
September, 2017
October, 2017
November, 2017
December, 2017
January, 2018
February, 2018
March, 2018
May, 2018
July, 2018
August, 2018
September, 2018
Why Positive Discrimination Is Still Discrimination By A Different Name (Or - Call Off The Parachute Regiment And Allow Talent Before Looks Or Gender)
I have been reading with interest about the furore surrounding the resignation (and apparent "over-promotion" before her resignation) of Baroness Warsi.  This is because - for me at least - it taps into one aspect of society which I simply cannot either understand or stand for.

Recently we have had endless debates about how certain sections of society are under-represented in the media and in Government - along with how we should rectify the situation to everybody's satisfaction.

Solutions have included parachuting female "comedians" into TV programmes such as "Mock The Week" and "Have I Got News For You" (I will explain the quotation marks in a minute), or (if one Lenford Henry Esquire has his way) creating a section of the BBC run by and employing people soley from the Black and Ethnic Minorities.  I am sorry but has Mr Henry not watched "EastEnders" recently???

The female "comedians" being parachuted into quiz show panels like "Mock The Week" have actually spoiled the programme for me for two reasons.  The first is they have obviously been parachuted in (one female per programme is hardly likely to raise the standard for women). and secondly - this may surprise you because I am female - I find most of the female "comedians" on TV seriously unfunny (I actually find some of the female "comedians" way more offensive than I find the male ones).

Baroness Warsi is a Muslim.  She was the first Muslim to be a member of the Cabinet in any British Government.  Baroness Warsi also happens to be female.  Apparently she is also the only Member or the current Parliament (House of Lords and House of Commons combined) to stand by her principles and her religious beliefs - as her resignation has proved.  So much for Mr Cameron's idea of putting her in the Cabinet as a token Muslim and a token lady from the Ethnic Minorities.

Seriously - I don't care who presents my news or acts in a programme I watch or holds a position in Government.  I just want to know they are the best person for the job.

Why don't I care about what they look like or how old they are, etc???  Mainly because I understand that the Media and "Public Life" bear little or no ressemblance to my life and they never will.

Much as I would love it if there was a character in a soap with a visual disability which was properly explored in a storyline, or a documentary which told people the true story about the real issues the disabled, unemployed, etc, face without "sexing it up" to win some mythical ratings war, I know it is never going to happen.  Controversy and ratings get exposure and exposure means money.

I will admit that people like Mary Beard, etc, do have a slight point when they say that the more mature female should be on the TV more.  However, I would go back to the point about being there on merit instead of being parachuted in to fulfil some mystical criteria which has been dreamed up by someone with too much time on their hands.

Whilst I am on the subject of parachuting people in to situations where they do not belong - can someone please explain to me why the nearest point of conflict is nearly always reported on by a British reporter???  Surely - in this day and age - there is at least one native reporter with a reasonable enough grasp of English to be able to report on the situation in their country???

As for the BBC's (they are the biggest culprits for this) nasty habit of deciding that the person who is reporting on a situation - and has made the mistake of stumbling anywhere near the studio when the "On Air" light was glowing - is not only an expert on whatever they have been reporting on but has somehow managed to miraculously morph into an expert on matters which have even the most tenuous link to the subect???  Do their contact books not have details on where to find proper experts???

Discrimination should be made illegal in all its forms - both negative and positive.  We need to foster a culture where people are judged on their talents alone.

<< Back Add New Comment
0 items total
Add New Comment
Please type the confirmation code you see on the image*
Reload image